AA.png

2017           淡江大學

失竊的公共城市

                __ 城市網格聚落

2017 淡江大學建築系畢業設計指導學生:吳聲懋 「失竊的公共城市-城市網格與聚落」,獲得IEAGD建築系畢業設計國際特展展覽

對於城市的印象,經常顯現於單一存在的正面。

 

新竹—作為台灣歷史古城之一,保留了許多過去生活的片段,三零年代街道改正後,多數的城牆被拆毀後重新塑造出現在的新竹紋理,許多不同時期所支配的公共空間破碎的並存於新與舊的紋理中,並且隱身於一連串商業與私人的街廓內部,我們藉由新竹城市所謂的“正面性空間”已無法直接地了解背後所隱含著生活的公共性,內部作為私人空間想像的延伸,不斷的模糊公共性的存在。

 

接續著過去的公共性,新竹市民眾活動中心/新竹美學館/中正台夜市,如同多數新竹內部公共空間,不斷地改變面對城市的方式,我認為城市內部的公共性不是像孤島般的存在,而是作為新竹日常生活的開始。企圖保留中正台夜市密實的內部紋理與空白的民眾活動中心,介於無條件可及的公共與私人空間的想像兩個介面中虛實對比,透過街廓外部原有的入口、開放的城市廣場、半公共的青年旅館,介入內部的公共中,在新竹,生活不僅僅存在於連續一致的正面之下,而是一個個內部的連結,因此我們可以穿梭在不同時期堆疊出的紋理之內,找回這個暫時被偷走的城市。

The Theft of Public City                           __Urban Grid Village

Wu, Sheng-Mao

The theft of public city is a state of city that was mislaid temporarily or was laid temporarily at the moment of the history. Followed the development of Hsinchu city, there were many common and public space in the internal blocks. They also were scattered on the new and old context of Hsinchu city. Therefore, we can't find out the commonality about life behind the blocks directly. So, internal space as a imagination of privacy that continuously blurred the existence of commonality in city. In Hsinchu city, life didn't only exist in much the same frontage. It's a relationship of the connection of the internal commonality. Accordingly we can through into the different space about different period that was overlapped context and we can refind the temporary theft of city.

吳聲懋